Alternative Paths for George Washington: A Mighty Commander or a Distinguished Militia Leader?

The American Revolutionary War was a time of chaos and uncertainty, with political and military landscapes changing rapidly. While George Washington is widely recognized as the Commander-in-Chief of the Continental Army, what if he hadn't taken on this role? Would he have accepted a lower commission or even remained a civilian? This article explores the alternative paths that George Washington might have taken and analyzes the roles he could have filled.

The Rise of George Washington

Aside from Washington, two other men—Charles Lee and Horatio Gates—displayed a certain natural talent for military leadership. However, both men ultimately proved inadequate during the heat of battle. The question remains: what would have happened if Washington, known for his drives and patience, had not become the Commander-in-Chief?

The Southern Army and Lower Commands

One possibility is that Washington might have taken a lesser command. He could have been appointed to head the Southern Army, an early command of Charles Lee's, or a division under Lee or Gates. Early in the war, Gates served under Washington, and it is possible that Washington could have performed his duties admirably in such a role before Lee and/or Gates failed their commands.

At that point, Congress would likely have appointed Washington as a replacement. After all, Washington was one of the few Americans with significant experience with "real" armies and command. His value to the rebel forces was immense, and he would not have been allowed to simply return home if his services were deemed necessary.

George Washington as a Delegate and Militia Leader

It is impossible to say with certainty what would have happened without the actual events of 1775 and 1776. Martha Washington burned many of her husband's letters, making it difficult to reconstruct his thoughts and decisions. However, we do know that on multiple occasions, Washington wore his Virginia Militia uniform while serving as a delegate to the Continental Congress in Philadelphia.

If it were not for John Adams' insight, the delegates from other colonies might have viewed the occupation of Boston differently. Adams realized that calling on militias from various colonies to Massachusetts could make this a truly American problem rather than just a New England one. Congress, lacking the authority to move their own militias, could still appoint a commander for the new Continental Army. Adams saw potential in Washington, who was known throughout the colonies and as a Virginian, due to his association with that state.

Continuing as a Militia Leader

An alternative scenario would see Washington continuing as a leading figure in the Virginia militia. In 1775 and 1776, Washington was one of a few Americans with significant military experience. His presence in the Virginia militia would have been invaluable to the rebel cause. If political considerations had prevented him from becoming Commander-in-Chief, he would still have been a highly respected ranking officer, potentially in the Southern colonies.

Conclusion

While George Washington's appointment as Commander-in-Chief of the Continental Army is a pivotal moment in American history, it is interesting to consider the alternative paths he might have taken. Would he have accepted a lower command or remained a civilian? The answer may never be known, but his contributions to the Virginia militia and his overall vision for American independence are undeniably significant.