Brexit: Johnson's Stance on the EU and Future Implications

British Prime Minister Boris Johnson's call for the European Union to rule out further delays in Brexit is a stance that garners significant support from those who believe in a prompt resolution to the ongoing disputes. This article delves into the broader implications of this position and explores the potential outcomes.

The EU and UK Finances: An Unequal Relationship

Johnson's insistence on a timely Brexit highlights the growing divide between the EU and the UK in terms of financial dependence. The European Union, heavily reliant on UK financial support, is likely to face a significant crisis without this support. This makes Johnson's demand for no further delay a strategic move, as the EU is fully aware of its vulnerability. The end of the corrupt syndicate, as Johnson sees it, is indeed looming over the European Union.

December 2020: A Critical Period for Brexit

The period leading up to December 2020 is critical for Brexit negotiations. Johnson has attempted to secure an agreement with the European Union by offering the Canadian-style trade deal, known as "Super Canada Plus." However, this deal faces numerous challenges, including legal accuracy and parliamentary ratification. The time between now and December is insufficient for all these tasks to be completed comprehensively.

Preparedness and Short-Term Gains

Johnson has proposed two primary scenarios: a no-deal Brexit and a negotiated trade deal. Both options require extensive preparations. Families and businesses in the UK need to be prepared for either scenario, as the immediate impact of a no-deal Brexit is concerning. Despite these challenges, Johnson remains committed to the UK's independence.

Northern Ireland and Political Leverage

In recent negotiations, Johnson has demonstrated a willingness to abandon Northern Ireland unionists to avoid the no-deal scenario. This political move has led to the creation of a revised withdrawal agreement that includes a permanent backstop. This could mean a new UK-EU trade relationship that Johnson might attempt to forge within the remaining time. The UK could also convert the standstill transition period into a new treaty, providing Johnson with leverage over his parliamentary colleagues.

MPs and the No-Deal Option

For the MPs, the decision is clear: either accept Johnson's deal or face the inevitability of a no-deal Brexit by December 2020. Extending the standstill transition period beyond this date would be legally impossible, and a referendum on rejoining the EU would be futile.

Conclusion

Bernie Johnson's pressing for the EU to rule out further delays in Brexit signals a significant shift in the UK's stance. Whether this leads to a no-deal crisis, a revised trade agreement, or a new permanent treaty remains to be seen. What is clear is that the clock is ticking, and all parties must be prepared to act decisively to navigate this complex and challenging period.