Do Creationists Deny Pangaea's Existence?

Creationists generally hold diverse views on geological history, including the concept of Pangaea, the supercontinent that existed millions of years ago. While some Creationists accept Pangaea's existence, they often interpret it through a biblical lens, suggesting it occurred during or shortly after the creation period described in the Bible. These proponents may argue that continental drift and plate tectonics are not supported by their interpretation of scripture.

Others reject Pangaea and the mechanisms of plate tectonics, proposing alternative explanations for the distribution of landmasses and fossils that align more closely with their beliefs about a young Earth and a global flood. This divergence highlights significant theological differences among Creationists.

Pangaea and Young Earth Science

Pangaea fits seamlessly into young Earth science. Genesis 10:25 indicates 'And unto Eber were born two sons: the name of one was Peleg for in his days was the earth divided and his brothers name was Joktan.' Here, 'earth divided' could have two possible interpretations. Either it refers to the confusion of tongues at the Tower of Babel, or it refers to continental drift. For those who accept the existence of Pangaea, the latter interpretation aligns perfectly.

As North and South America shifted to their present positions, the sliding of their plate over the Pacific plate caused mountain ranges to form and earthquakes to occur. This geological activity was a common occurrence even up to the present day, influencing construction patterns in Central America and Mexico. Additionally, according to Plato, the legendary Atlantis was submerged in a single day, and its survivors migrated and built Mexico City in a similar circular pattern.

Theological Perspectives on Pangaea

Continental drift occurred approximately 3100 BC and ceased around 2200 BC. The Ice Age coincided with this period, caused by warm ocean water following the Great Flood, leading to massive precipitation and continuous volcanic ash obstructing the sun, resulting in massive evaporation and snow accumulation. The earth began warming after that, forming deserts near the equator as the melting ice pushed arable land further north.

Alternatively, current scientific explanations suggest that the Sahara desert might have been caused by massive bovine methane production from Egypt. This interpretation challenges traditional geological assumptions while maintaining a young Earth perspective.