Do Flat Earthers Have a Specific Proposed Model to Compete with the Globe?
When it comes to the debate between the flat Earth and the globe Earth models, questions often arise about what specific models flat Earthers propose. The general perception might suggest a lack of coherent thought behind the flat Earth theory; however, there is indeed a range of proposed models within the flat Earth community.
The Flat Earth Community's Models
The flat Earth community is surprisingly diverse, with multiple proposed models. These models vary significantly, ranging from simpler flat plane hypotheses to more complex ones involving domes, ice walls, and other unique features.
One of the simplest models involves a flat plane. However, critics often point out that if the Earth is flat, then moving upward should theoretically prevent further movement, which goes against common experience. Support for this model could come from a misunderstanding of the physics involved, specifically relativity.
Other models propose a dome-shaped ceiling over the flat Earth, which might seem more plausible to some at first glance. These models often feature the idea of an ice wall at the edge of the flat plane or the dome, preventing cosmic expansion.
Similarities and Differences
One of the points of confusion often raised by flat Earthers is the assertion that ancient civilizations and explorers believed the Earth to be flat. This claim is sometimes used in conjunction with the assertion that the globe Earth model is relatively recent.
However, the flat Earth community is contradictory in its stance. They argue that flat Earth is a recent development, evolving and gaining support over the past few years. On the other hand, they also claim that ancient civilizations knew the Earth was flat, which is an inconsistent narrative at best.
The true issue lies in the lack of a coherent and scientifically robust model. Flatties often get confused because they are dealing with a concept that contradicts centuries of scientific evidence and observations. The flat Earth model does not align with fundamental principles of physics and astronomy, making it difficult to propose a working model that can compete with the globe Earth model.
Conclusion: A Lack of Coherent Model
Despite the variety of proposed models within the flat Earth community, there remains a critical lack of a convincing and scientifically sound model. The flat Earth community often struggles to present a single, cohesive narrative that can stand up to scrutiny. Critics and proponents of the globe Earth model easily dismiss these narratives because they lack empirical evidence and consistent scientific support.
The complexity and confusion within the flat Earth community highlight the importance of scientific rigor and evidence in developing models of our world. Until flat Earthers can present a model that is both logically consistent and empirically verifiable, their claims will remain on the fringes of mainstream science.