Japan’s Missed Opportunity: Why It Did Not Use Nuclear Weapons Against the United States

Why Did Japan Not Use Nuclear Weapons Against the United States After World War II?

During World War II, both Japan and Germany were heavily investing in nuclear weapons. However, they faced significant challenges that prevented them from fully developing and utilizing these weapons. This article explores why Japan, in particular, did not deploy nuclear weapons against the United States.

The Technological and Resource Limitations

In 1939, the development of a nuclear weapon was a colossal undertaking that required vast resources, both financial and human. According to historical estimates, the development of a nuclear bomb required about 2 billion dollars and over 20,000 workers, with a continuous power supply of more than 100 megawatts (MW) each hour for several years. This was an astronomical figure that neither Japan nor Germany had at their disposal.

Japan, in particular, was severely constrained by its lack of excess labor and resources. By the late 1940s, the country faced significant challenges in sustaining its workforce and maintaining essential services. Moreover, the lack of readily available fuel to power construction machinery for large-scale industrialization further hindered their efforts. Even if Japan had the financial resources, it had insufficient labor and energy to build the necessary infrastructure to produce nuclear weapons.

Comparison to Modern Dollar Values

To put the 1939 dollar figure into perspective, 2 billion 1939 dollars is equivalent to about 350 billion dollars in 2024. In 1939, a nice home on one acre of land cost around 5,000 dollars, which is roughly 500,000 or 2 million dollars in 2024, depending on the location. These figures starkly highlight the difficulties Japan faced in accumulating the necessary funds to develop nuclear weapons.

The Surrender and Materials Transfer

Germany attempted to transfer their nuclear materials and progress to Japan as they surrendered. However, this transfer was interrupted, and the materials was never delivered. When Germany surrendered, Japanese vessels at sea returned to Japan, rather than continuing to deliver the materials to the Japanese forces in the Pacific. This starkly illustrates the strained and chaotic nature of the final days of World War II and the complex logistics involved in such a sensitive operation.

Efforts and Capabilities in Japan

Japan had a minimal understanding of nuclear physics, with only two individuals focusing on the subject during the war, and no official program. These two individuals did not even collaborate, demonstrating the fragmented and underdeveloped nature of Japan’s nuclear efforts. Even in 1945, Japan was 30 years behind the United States in the development of nuclear weapons. This significant technological gap made it highly improbable for Japan to develop nuclear weapons in the remaining time of the war.

Strategic Reasons and the Ultimate Decision

The United States also had strategic reasons for not wanting Japan to know that they had run out of nuclear weapons. An unusual display of restraint was employed, as the U.S. did not wish to reveal its stockpile or capabilities. This strategic decision likely played a role in the decision not to use additional nuclear weapons in Japan.

In the end, the U.S. chose to use the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, as Tokyo had already been heavily bombed and there was nothing left to nuke. On March 9, 1945, 330 B-29 bombers dropped incendiary bombs on Tokyo, resulting in over 100,000 deaths and the destruction of 63% of the commercial area and 18% of the industrial area. This attack showed the U.S.'s capability, but there was no need to demonstrate this again through the use of an atomic bomb in Tokyo.

Conclusion

Japan’s failure to use nuclear weapons against the United States was a result of technological limitations, resource constraints, and the strategic decisions made by both Japan and the United States. The broader context of World War II and the resource-intensive nature of nuclear weapon development played a pivotal role in shaping the historical outcome.