Reclaiming the Term: Why "Brexiteer" Should Be Preferred Over "Brexidiot"

The debate over Brexit and the terms used to describe its supporters often become contentious. One particular term, 'Brexidiot', falls into the pejorative category, while 'Brexiteer' is the reclaimed term aimed at reclaiming honors and discarding negative connotations.

From the Cuckoo's Nest to the Refinery: The Evolution of Terms

It is quite common to see people favor the term 'Brexidiot,' which is designed to mock and demean those who support the UK's exit from the European Union. However, instead of letting this term take over, many have opted to embrace 'Brexiteer' as a reclaimed term. 'Brexiteer' is a neologism that was initially used to mock the supporters of Brexit but has since been adopted by its advocates in an attempt to refute the negative connotations associated with the term 'Brexidiot'.

The Grammatical and Semantics of "Brexiteer"

Calling someone a 'Brexiteer' acknowledges their support for the Brexit cause in a neutral manner. The term 'Brexiteer' is a corruption of the word 'brigadier,' which, when used to describe Brexit supporters, further inflicts the stereotype of them as militaristic, Empire-obsessed, little Englanders, often with existential anxieties. This term is loaded with pejorative overtones and is rooted in the misconception that all Brexit supporters share a certain set of characteristics or attitudes.

Reclaiming Words as a Defense Mechanism

Using 'Brexiteer' is a form of defense mechanism. It acknowledges the various factions within the pro-Brexit camp while rejecting the pejorative connotations associated with 'Brexidiot.' The term 'Brexiteer' refers to a swashbuckling persona with more conviction than sense, drawing loose connections to buccaneers or musketeers. This persona is both a caricature and a celebration of the daredevil spirit many pro-Brexit supporters claim to embody.

The Power of Language in Shaping Perceptions

The power of language lies in its ability to shape and reflect societal perceptions. When one adopts a reclaimed term, they are essentially reclaiming the narrative and asserting their right to be taken seriously. Embracing 'Brexiteer' is a way to reclaim personal and political dignity, turning a once mocking term into a badge of honor.

The Debate and the Language Game

Both sides of the debate often engage in using pejorative expressions, such as "Remoaner" for those who oppose Brexit. Using pejoratives enforces stereotypes and prematurely judgments, undermining serious and respectful discourse. It is important to remember that serious discussions should not be reduced to name-calling and stereotyping.

Embracing Neutral Language in Discussions

On platforms such as Quora, where discussions on sensitive topics are common, it is crucial to maintain a neutral and respectful tone. Terms like "leaver" and "remainer" are shortcuts for describing individuals who voted to leave or remain in the European Union, respectively. These terms avoid the validation of preconceived notions and focus on the facts rather than the person.

Conclusion: The Battle of Words

The battle for the words and terms that define the Brexit debate is ongoing. While the term 'Brexidiot' seeks to diminish the arguments of its targets, 'Brexiteer' seeks to reclaim them. Embracing 'Brexiteer' is not just about adopting a different term but about taking back the narrative, asserting one's stance, and promoting respectful and informed discourse.

By consciously choosing to use neutral and reclaimed terms, we move closer to productive conversations and greater mutual understanding. The power of language lies in its ability to create and shape the world around us. It's time to reclaim and redefine these terms to foster a more respectful and inclusive dialogue.