Revisiting the Democratic Ticket: Who Could Have Been a Better Vice President Than Kamala Harris?

Revisiting the Democratic Ticket: Who Could Have Been a Better Vice President Than Kamala Harris?

The recent discourse around the Democratic presidential ticket has sparked much debate, particularly regarding the suitability of Kamala Harris as the Vice President. As the election draws closer, some are questioning whether there might have been a better choice than Kamala Harris. Suggestions range from the whimsical, like SpongeBob SquarePants or Minnie Mouse, to more serious proposals of a more experienced figure from the ranks of successful governors or business leaders.

The argument for a better choice primarily hinges on the belief that Kamala Harris has a horrible record as a Vice President. The followers of former President Biden, while elated at the success of the Democratic party in certain arenas, worry that a similar approach to their political opponents (like the liberal use of government agencies to combat Trump) might not pan out favorably when the roles are reversed. It's a stark reminder that the pendulum of power can swing significantly even within the same party.

Democratic Party Strategy and Future Prospects

The Democratic Party has the ability to secure a landslide victory in this election if they were to dump both Biden and Harris and opt for a more centrist ticket. Ideas range from a successful, popular governor to a businessman or woman with solid track records. However, it's important to avoid figures like Newsome, who may not bring the necessary talent and competence to the table. The call for an open convention is gaining traction, with some arguing that delegates have not yet committed their support.

The Democratic National Committee (DNC) has a critical role to play in this scenario. With Trump having delivered an awful acceptance speech at the convention and neutralizing his wind at his back, and with the current disappointments in key cabinet positions, the party needs a swift and decisive move to regain public confidence. Addressing the failures in transportation, homeland security, and the Secret Service industries, as well as the growing public loss of trust in the DOJ and FBI, can be swiftly accomplished with new, competent leadership.

"After Trump" Scenario and Future Planning

Another option, put forth by some, is to simply let the election play out. If Trump wins, his tenure will last for four years, after which the Democrats can plan and execute their next move more meticulously and selectively. This approach does present its own set of challenges, as addressing the current issues of inflation, mortgage rates, energy costs, immigration chaos and so on, will require substantial effort and planning.

Either way, the outcome hinges on the Democratic Party's ability to rally and present a compelling case. For the 76-year-old life-long Democrat who fears that Kamala Harris is utterly unqualified for the presidency, a write-in campaign for Joseph Scarborough has been proposed as an alternative. It's a stark reminder of the deep divisions within the party and the high stakes involved in the upcoming election.

As the election approaches, the debate around the Democratic ticket, particularly the vice presidency, continues to evolve. The path forward requires courage, competence, and clear vision to captivate the electorate and secure a victory.