Should the US-Mexico Border Wall be Removed: Debating the Symbol and Functionality

The question of whether the US border wall with Mexico should be removed is a complex one, rooted in political, social, and economic debates. Some argue that the wall, a symbol of Trumpism and racism, should be dismantled, while others contend that it needs reinforcement for security purposes. This article explores the implications of retaining or removing the border wall, considering both its symbolism and practical functionality.

The Symbolism of the Border Wall

For many critics of the border wall, it represents more than just a physical barrier. It is seen as a symbol of anti-American values, including racism, exceptionalism, and the unwelcoming stance towards immigrants. The oft-quoted phrases from The New Colossus by Emma Lazarus, such as 'Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,' stand in sharp contrast to the wall's image. Critics argue that the wall obstructs pathways to the American dream and perpetuates stereotypes about immigrants and their contributions to society.

Security Concerns and Defensive Measures

Proponents of the border wall argue that it is crucial for national security and the protection against illegal invasions. They advocate for the strengthening and expansion of the wall, backed by additional measures like towers and sharpshooters. According to advocates, the wall serves as a deterrent and helps secure the border against criminal invaders. For instance, over two million criminal invaders were reported by the end of the previous year, necessitating a more robust response.

The Legacy and Historical Context

The idea of a border wall is not a novel concept. Previous administrations, including those of Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama, also undertook initiatives to border security. For instance, President Bush signed the Secure Fence Act in 2006, calling for the erection of hundreds of miles of barriers along the border. By the end of Bush's tenure, approximately 526 miles of border barrier had been constructed, including both pedestrian fencing and vehicle barrier. Similarly, the Obama-Biden Administration continued the construction, adding 128 miles of border wall.

When Donald Trump assumed office in 2017, he inherited 654 miles of border barrier. By the time his administration concluded in 2021, it claimed to have completed more than 400 miles of border wall, with a total of 452 miles. However, much of this wall was not entirely new, but rather replacement of previous structures. Only 80 miles of the new barriers were built in areas without previous wall structures, including 47 miles of primary wall and 33 miles of secondary wall to reinforce initial barriers.

Opportunities for Reform and Humanitarian Support

An alternative approach to the current structure could be the transformation of parts of the wall into a more humane and functional system. Advocates suggest building hotels and immigration offices alongside the wall, complete with medical clinics and citizenship schools. These facilities could serve as centers for immigrants, providing them with vaccination, education, and pathways to citizenship. This approach is akin to what Ellis Island did in its heyday, where immigrants were welcomed and supported as they integrated into society.

Conclusion

The debate over the US-Mexico border wall is far from resolved. Whether to retain, strengthen, or remove it depends on one's interpretation of its symbolism and its practical necessity. While some see it as a symbol of exclusion, others see it as a safeguard. As the political climate evolves, so too must the discussions surrounding this contentious issue, with a focus on finding solutions that balance security and humanitarian values.