The Implications of New Mexico Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham’s Gun Ban in Albuquerque

In response to rising violence in the city of Albuquerque, New Mexico Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham issued an emergency order suspending the open and concealed carry of firearms within city limits. While the governor's intentions may have been to enhance public safety, the implications of this action are profound and far-reaching, affecting not just those within the governed city but the broader legal and ethical landscape.

Constitutional Rights and Legal Deficiencies

The first and most immediate implication is the suspension of the constitutional right to bear arms as enshrined in the Second Amendment. The Fifth Amendment further guarantees the right to life, liberty, and property, and the Second Amendment is often seen as a key component of these freedoms. By bypassing established legal procedures and suspending gun rights, Lujan Grisham has essentially overstepped her authority, raising questions about the rule of law.

Impact on Law-Abiding Citizens

The most vulnerable group affected by this decision are the law-abiding citizens, particularly those living in economically disadvantaged neighborhoods where crime rates are already high. These individuals, who have been exercising their constitutional rights, suddenly find themselves in a dangerous environment with limited means to protect themselves or their families. This situation places them at an increased risk of becoming victims of violent crime, assault, or even murder.

Disproportionate Impact on Low-Income Communities

The impact of the gun ban is not distributed equally. Low-income individuals and those residing in the poorest neighborhoods are disproportionately affected. These areas are often plagued by high levels of crime, and the sudden removal of firearms as a form of personal protection leaves these communities even more vulnerable. The rich and privileged, who can afford private security measures, will not be significantly impacted, while the poor are left defenseless.

Ethical and Political Implications

Politically, the actions of Governor Lujan Grisham have brought to light critical ethical and constitutional concerns. Elected officials, including governor, senators, and even high-profile figures like Joe Biden, swear an oath to uphold and protect the Constitution. Suspension of constitutional rights without due process is a violation of these oaths and can be considered an act of disloyalty and even potential treason.

Public Safety and Criminal Activity

The governor’s logic that such an order will enhance public safety is flawed. Criminals, who typically do not adhere to laws, will continue to operate as before. The reality is that removing legitimate firearms from the hands of law-abiding citizens might embolden criminals, who can then commit violent acts knowing that their victims have no means of resistance. This has the potential to lead to an increase in violent crime.

Legal Challenges and Consequences

Despite the governor’s intentions, the legal and ethical implications of such actions cannot be ignored. Lawsuits are likely to be filed against Governor Lujan Grisham, and the credibility of any elected official who oversteps their constitutional authority is immediately called into question. If the court determines that the order was unconstitutional, it could lead to her impeachment, further damaging the public’s trust in government.

Conclusion

The suspension of the right to bear arms in Albuquerque, by Governor Lujan Grisham, underscores the importance of constitutional rights and the rule of law. The implications of this action extend far beyond the city itself, challenging the concept of equal protection under the law and the integrity of elected officials. As the legal challenges unfold, it remains to be seen how this episode will shape future governance and public safety policies.