Why Jordan Does Not Align With Palestinians: Historical Context and Current Politics

Often misunderstood, Jordan's relationship with Palestinians is a multifaceted issue rooted in complex historical and political dynamics. This article aims to provide a comprehensive overview of why Jordan, under different regimes, has chosen to support Israel over Palestinians. We will also explore underlying reasons for the scrutiny and biases that have surrounded issues involving Palestinians.

The Historical Role of Countries in the Middle East

While generalizations are often harsh and misleading, it is critical to understand that many countries in the region, including Jordan, have played various roles in the ongoing conflict. Jordan itself, with its unique history, has often found itself caught in the middle, navigating the delicate balance between supporting Israel and maintaining its own geopolitical and security interests.

The current political alignment of Jordan with Israel can be traced back to the late 1940s when Israel was established. King Abdullah I, the late king of Jordan at the time, had complex views on Palestinians. He recognized the potential for trouble that Palestinians could bring, especially when they settled in areas leading to further geopolitical disputes. For instance, the displacement of Palestinians from disputed territories and their settlement in places like Lebanon have continually resulted in tense situations.

Bringing in Refugees vs Supporting Apartheid

While some countries, like Jordan, welcomed Iraqi refugees, the larger issue revolves around the support for Israel over the Palestinians, which has led to criticisms. One of the primary reasons Jordan maintains this stance is the fear of becoming complicit in Israeli policies of ethnic cleansing and apartheid.

The argument against Palestinian support is often rooted in the idea that Palestinians’ integration into Jordan would lead to a significant population surge, reducing Jordan’s available resources. For instance, if around seven million Palestinians were included in Jordan, the country’s land area would shrink from 118,000 square kilometers to 92,000 square kilometers. This reduction in resources and population would be unacceptable for any sovereign nation, and many perceive it as such.

Complexities of Palestinian Identity Among Populations

It is essential to clarify that the identity of Palestinians is broader and more nuanced. While some Palestinians have indeed engaged in violent activities, others have contributed positively to their communities and have been peaceful advocates for their rights. The historical resentment towards Palestinians often reeks of a misinformation campaign that paints all Palestinians as violent troublemakers.

It is also crucial to mention that not all Jordanians or Palestinians share the same views or affiliations. The complex interplay of cultural, political, and historical factors has created an environment where some Palestinians have been welcomed, while others have been marginalized. The Queen herself exemplifies this complexity, as she represents multiple identities and backgrounds.

Furthermore, the Palestinian leadership, particularly Arafat, has at times engaged in controversial actions. However, it is important to understand these actions within the context of the broader struggle for self-determination and the challenges faced by Palestinians in the region.

Factual Evidence and Conclusion

While some critics argue that Jordan tolerates Palestinians based on their historical and cultural ties, others scrutinize Jordan’s policies on the basis of ethical and moral grounds. The argument that Jordan supports Israel over Palestinians is more nuanced and complex than a simple statement of likes and dislikes.

Ultimately, the reasons for Jordan's alignment with Israel are multifaceted, involving historical, political, and security considerations. Understanding these points can help foster a more informed and nuanced debate about the ongoing conflict and the role of various nations in the region.