Introduction
In recent years, the discourse surrounding Russia's involvement in Eastern European affairs has been rampant with misunderstandings and misinformation. A common misconception is that Russia should have invaded the weaker Baltic states initially, instead of Ukraine, due to their supposed pro-Russian leanings. This article aims to clarify these misconceptions by examining the realities of Baltic state perspectives, their motivations, and historical contexts.
Why Russia Invaded Ukraine, Not the Baltic States
Myth 1: Baltic States Are Weak
Contrary to popular belief, the Baltic states—Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania—are not weaker than Ukraine. In fact, their hatred of Soviet and Russian influence runs deeper than in Ukraine, making them staunch protectors of their sovereignty. The Baltic states were the first former Soviet republics to join NATO and the European Union, representing a strong desire to distance themselves from Russian influence and embrace Western values.
Myth 2: Baltic States Support Russia
None of the Baltic states support Russia. They were early adopters of NATO and EU membership, recognizing the benefits of Western influence and security guarantees. These countries have consistently sought protection from Russian aggression, unlike Ukraine which has engaged with both Eastern and Western partners for decades.
Understanding the Invasion: SMO vs. Invasion
The term 'Special Military Operation' (SMO) was used by Russia to describe its actions in Ukraine, misleadingly suggesting a defensive or humanitarian mission. In reality, this operation was an invasion, encompassing the annexation of Crimea, military operations, and annexation of parts of eastern Ukraine.
Myth 3: Baltic Countries Wanted Russian Liberation
Baltic states have no desire to be "liberated" from Western influence; they actively oppose any Russian encroachment. NATO and EU membership provide them with the means to resist Russian pressure and ensure their sovereignty. Joining these organizations was a strategic move to secure their independence and freedom from Russian dominance.
The Myth of “Liberation” and Realities of the Conflict
The notion that the Baltic states or Ukraine should have willingly succumbed to Russian influence is not only naive but also completely inconsistent with their geopolitical realities. Russia's history of forcibly liberating territories and populations from what it perceives as external influences is well-documented. This practice has caused immense suffering and hardship for countless individuals.
Myth 4: Russian Pro-Ukraine Influence
Before the conflict, Ukraine was indeed plagued by corruption and political instability, which some, including Putin, attributed to Western influence. However, this does not justify military intervention. Putin's actions have been driven by a combination of political strategy and a desire to expand Russian influence in the region.
Conclusion
The complex geopolitical landscape of Eastern Europe is shaped by historical, economic, and cultural factors. Understanding the nuances between Baltic and Ukrainian perspectives can provide a clearer picture of why Russia invaded Ukraine and why the Baltic states remain staunchly aligned with Western institutions.
Russia has been a formidable opponent, and its actions in Ukraine have highlighted the importance of collective security measures. Countries like the Baltic states, with their NATO and EU membership, have chosen a path that prioritizes stability and security over misguided notions of liberation from Western influence.