Why Does the European Union Still Pay Salaries to Unattending MEPs?

Many are questioning why the European Union continues to pay salaries to Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) who do not attend the sessions. This situation raises significant concerns about the integrity and efficiency of the current political system.

Corruption and Inefficiency in Political Systems

There is a prevailing belief that the system is intentionally corrupted, primarily for the benefit of the members themselves. Critics argue that MEPs are overpaid and exploit fantastic pension schemes, allowing them to claim expenses without providing proof of their actual use. This practice has been prevalent among European politicians and has unfortunately started to spread into British politics.

Exceptions and Dedication in the MEP Community

While it is understandable to critique MEPs who earn incomparably more than their work warrants, it is also true that some MEPs take their roles very seriously and go beyond the required tasks. This is indeed a characteristic of any profession: there are both diligent and less committed individuals. However, the inconsistency in handling payments for non-attendance is concerning.

Curious Anomalies and Unintended Consequences

One particularly perplexing anomaly is the treatment of Brexit MEPs who, despite their rudeness and absence during EU Parliament openings, continue to receive their salaries. This is true even if they do not participate in debates or other parliamentary activities.

It is important to understand that the EU’s payment scheme is not meant to be a personal benefit but rather a service to the taxpaying public. The same principle applies to the House of Lords in the UK, where peers attend, sign in, and then leave without attending the debates, often receiving a daily payment along with expenses, which is a clear abuse of power.

Parliamentary Representation and Accountability

MEPs are salaried to provide representation for their constituents, who elected them. If an MEP consistently does not attend sessions without a compelling reason, such as a genuine political or ethical stance (like Sinn Fein, for example), their constituents have every right to vote them out in the next election. Similarly, the "Merry Brexiteers" should also face the consequences of their actions.

The essence of any parliamentary democracy is a mix of affirmation and despair. It is often best described as 'democracy is the worst form of government except for all the others,' as famously said by Winston Churchill. Nevertheless, despite the imperfections, it remains the best system we have.

Conclusion

The primary responsibility of an MEP involves crafting propositions and engaging in discussions with other MEPs and stakeholders, which is far more complex than merely attending speeches in the auditorium. Although they receive a monthly allowance, a significant portion is only paid on a daily basis, and they must personally report to the Brussels office each morning to receive it. This highlights the importance of accountability and integrity in the political system.