Why Liberals Believe the 2020 Election Was Not Rigged

Many liberal supporters believe the 2020 US election was not rigged mainly for two reasons. First, they view themselves as the moral and ethical champions, who trust in a free and fair democratic process as promised by their leaders. Second, because their preferred candidate, Joe Biden, won the election, they feel compelled to defend this victory and cannot accept that it might have been stolen.

However, not all liberals hold this view. Some do acknowledge the allegations of rigging, sometimes with glee, fueling their own narratives of injustice and mistrust. As many are dual-duty critical thinkers, they are focused on the burden of proof required in any legal dispute. The onus is on Republicans to prove any allegations of fraud. But, despite extensive efforts, they have failed to produce compelling evidence.

Contacting Institutions for Verification

In every legitimate dispute, one must first prove the fault. In the case of the 2020 election, Republicans have made numerous claims but provided weak evidence. The Democrats, by contrast, have consistently insisted that no verifiable proof exists of widespread election fraud, hence there is no reason for them to need to prove a negative. In fact, they argue that there would always be minor irregularities, which are standard in every election, too insignificant to significantly impact the outcome.

From a logical standpoint, it is indeed much easier for the party in power to rig an election because they can do so more covertly. If Democrats had planned to rig the 2024 election, they would have had the perfect opportunity to manipulate the results, as they were already in power. Yet, Republicans recognized the results and conceded, indicating that the Democrats did not attempt to manipulate the outcome.

Looking ahead, the 2028 election cycle could be particularly interesting, especially if Donald Trump remains a vocal presence. Trump's continued influence and his rhetoric that he was the rightful winner of the 2020 election may foster further speculation and mistrust among his supporters.

Distinction Between Courage and Unwarranted Claims

Some express fear that the lack of real evidence is due to a deliberate attempt to mislead the public. Claiming that if one lies long enough, the public will eventually believe it, these critics point to the significant drop in voter turnout in the 2024 election as evidence of the massive fraud in the 2020 election. They argue that this disparity in voter participation is untenable and indicative of a massive conspiracy.

This lack of evidence extends to previous elections as well. Many liberals and other disinterested observers see no reason to doubt the legitimacy of previous elections. There is a general belief that election fraud is often due to political manipulation for short-term gain. Continuous and unfounded claims of election fraud can be seen as a tactic used by the Republican party, particularly by figures like Trump, to sow discord among the electorate and promote an us-versus-them mentality.

However, it is essential to recognize that lying about election fraud can have serious consequences. It erodes public trust in the democratic process and can lead to social unrest and political instability. The 2020 election, while contentious, was widely regarded as a free and fair process, even if shortcomings occurred. Holding a formal investigation into election results can be crucial to maintaining the integrity of democratic institutions.

Conclusion

The truth of the 2020 election remains a topic of debate. While some liberals believe in a free and fair process, others are skeptical and see evidence of rigged results. The reality likely lies somewhere in the middle, with a mix of genuine irregularities and political manipulation. As we move forward, it is important to approach these discussions with credible evidence and a commitment to upholding the principles of democracy and the rule of law.