Understanding the Hostility of Physicists Towards Mathematical Physics Papers
Often, when a lay person or an amateur enters the academic domain with a complex mathematical physics document, they might encounter a series of responses that can appear hostile, dismissive, or even aggressive. This article explores the reasons behind such reactions, drawing on the experiences and insights of experts in the field.
The Context of Rejection
When a nonspecialist attempts to present a mathematical physics paper, they might face a barrage of criticism. This can seem disproportionate, especially when the papers are repeatedly misinterpreted or attacked. Consider the following example:
"Because they HAVE ADDRESSED your Angular Energy pathetic garbage of a paper HUNDREDS OF TIMES. But being the worthless liar that you are you just LIE and PRETEND that none of the thousands of answers and comments debunking your stupid nonsense just don’t exist. Go away and get professional psychiatric medical help. There’s something seriously wrong with you."
Instances like this provide a snapshot of the frustration and disapproval experienced by many when dealing with a document that is seen as fundamentally flawed.
Why Experts Might Be Hostile
Experts in mathematical physics might become hostile when faced with such papers because of several reasons:
1. Repeated Misinterpretation and Dismissal
Experts note that these non-specialists have attempted to address their subject multiple times, often misinterpreting the core concepts of mathematical physics. A typical reaction might be:
"You keep telling them you know their subject better than they do. For example the editor of the Journal of Mathematical Physics thinks your document is not a paper on mathematical physics but you refuse to accept his verdict. Ive read the definition of “mathematical physics” and there’s no doubt - he’s right and you’re wrong. And not just wrong but so wrong I dont need to be a professional physicist to see the mismatch between the definition and your excrescence of a document."
This repeated misunderstanding and outright dismissal of professional feedback can lead to considerable frustration among experts.
2. Insolence and Disrespect
When an amateur insists on their viewpoint despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary, and inscribes their lack of respect for experts, the consequence can be a strong hostile reaction:
"Look at this moron deflect his inability to calculate one of the major forces in his non-experiment."
The experts might feel that the persistent disregard for feedback and the insulting remarks betray a fundamental lack of understanding and respect for the scientific community.
Consequences of Misunderstandings
These reactions are rooted in a larger issue: the academic community's pushback against those who propagate incorrect or misleading information in the field of mathematical physics. Such conduct is not only unhelpful but can also mislead the public and waste valuable time and resources.
Systematic Misconceptions and Lies
Many experts agree that amateur papers in mathematical physics often contain "nave misconceptions and lies" that stem from a lack of proper training and understanding. This has led to a general disdain for contributions from those who have not been formally educated in the field:
"Already the fact that one of them claims he did betrays him indeed as an arrogant crackpot. In fact such pathetic excuses of a paper systematically turn out to be fuming piles of crap consisting exclusively of nave misconceptions and lies whenever an experts glances at them. The one from the OP is no exception to the above description nor his he himself."
These misconceptions and lies can harm the credibility of the field and lead to further hostility from the community.
Conclusion
In summary, while it might appear that the scientific community in mathematical physics is hostile to amateurs like the OP, the root cause lies in a genuine concern for the integrity and accuracy of the field. Experts are not just being hostile; they are ensuring that the work being done is based on sound principles and accurate understanding. For those who wish to contribute to the field, engaging with the community, seeking feedback, and understanding the principles thoroughly is essential.
FAQs
Q1: Why are physicists generally hostile to mathematical papers by amateurs?
A1: Physicists are often hostile because amateurs frequently misinterpret core concepts and refuse to accept professional critiques, leading to frustration and a desire to maintain the scientific integrity of the field.
Q2: How can an amateur contribute positively to the field?
A2: An amateur can contribute positively by seeking feedback from experts, engaging with the scientific community, and ensuring that their work is based on sound principles and accurate understanding.
Q3: What are the key misconceptions that arise in amateur mathematical physics papers?
A3: Key misconceptions often include a lack of proper understanding of fundamental definitions, equations, and principles, leading to incorrect or nonsensical conclusions.