Why Should You Not Be a Far-Right White Nationalist?

Choosing to align with far-right white nationalism is a choice that places one on a side historically dominated by groups that have been considered losers. This includes the Confederate South, Nazi Germany, and Apartheid South Africa. These entities are typically remembered not for their success, but for their oppressive policies and the suffering they caused.

Historical Context and Revisionist Perspectives

The Rebel South's declarations of secession often cited slavery, particularly the ownership of Black people by white people, as their primary goal. When people claim that the Confederate South's secession was about "states' rights," it is a euphemism for maintaining the right of white people to own Black people. This mindset has historically led to horrific and oppressive systems.

Nazi Germany and Apartheid South Africa stand as other stark examples of far-right movements that have been responsible for widespread suffering and are now widely condemned. The operation of death camps and the imprisonment of Nelson Mandela are not remembered fondly, highlighting the moral and ethical failures of these regimes.

The Nature of Far-Right White Nationalism and Its Consequences

Far-right white nationalism, often encompassed within the broader definition of fascism, is characterized by its self-destructiveness. The movement claims a glorious history that can never be fully achieved, as it is constantly prevented by an enemy. This enemy shifts over time, making others the focus of hate and oppression. Today, it might be the Black community or the left. Tomorrow, it could be others, continuously excluding and marginalizing different groups. In the end, unless one is at the very top, they will likely be subject to the movement's destructive tendencies.

The embracing of far-right ideologies often leads to a loss of universal rights and fundamental freedoms. Those who oppose these movements are often portrayed as enemies, leading to a society where dissent is met with hostility and fear.

Alternatives to Far-Right White Nationalism

There is a need for a more balanced and respectful approach to politics. Right-wing ideologies do not have to adopt the extreme views found in far-right white nationalism. True conservatism involves a critical examination of what has worked in the past and why, leading to incremental change. It should focus on economic and social policies that foster growth and inclusivity, rather than restrict and divide.

Patriotism, as opposed to nationalism, is a better framework for unity. A patriot loves their country and works to improve it, acknowledging its flaws. A nationalist places their country's ideals above all else, even at the cost of human rights and ethical standards.

Conclusion

Considering the historical and ethical implications, it is advisable to avoid embracing far-right white nationalism. Instead, one can champion more moderate and inclusive political views, rooted in a balanced analysis of historical success and a commitment to progressive social and economic change. By doing so, one can contribute to a more stable and just society.