Why a Nuked Cargo Ship Is the Worst Solution to Clear the Suez Canal Blockage

The recent incident involving a cargo ship blocking the Suez Canal has left many wondering about the best course of action. Some have suggested nuking the ship as a way to clear the obstruction. However, experts weigh in on why this is not only ineffective but also a catastrophically bad idea.

The Ineffectiveness of Nuking the Cargo Ship

The idea of detonating a nuclear bomb to clear the canal is misguided. Even if a portion of the ship were to vaporize, the majority of the vessel would remain, continuing to block the canal. Beyond that, the resultant debris and radioactive materials would cause further destruction and contamination. For instance, when you detonate a nuclear weapon, it primarily leaves behind a molten and polluted wreck. This would not only clog the canal for a much longer period but also cause significant environmental harm.

The Environmental Hazards

A nuclear explosion in the immediate vicinity would result in a radioactive cloud that could spread beyond the canal and into Europe. Additionally, the ship in question carries a massive amount of Heavy Fuel Oil (HFO), approximately 2 million gallons, which is highly flammable and detrimental to human health when inhaled. A nuclear explosion would make the oil even more dangerous, potentially causing severe pollution in the surrounding area.

Ecological and Economic Ramifications

The ecological impact of a nuclear detonation would be grim. The canal, which is only 24 meters deep, is already in danger of being irreparably damaged. The blockage, combined with the environmental disaster that would ensue, would result in prolonged closure of the canal, causing significant economic losses and ruining the ecosystem for years to come.

Alternative Solutions

Fortunately, the ship has now been freed and is moving to a lake area for inspection. This is a pragmatic approach that minimizes environmental and economic damage. Specific actions such as harnessing tugboats, dredging equipment, and clearing the debris with specialized machinery can help ensure a safe and efficient resolution without resorting to drastic and harmful measures.

There are clear reasons why the ship should not be blown up. The resultant debris and radioactive materials would create significant blockages, while the environmental impact of oil spillage and pollution would be severe. A sustained blockage for even a longer period would not be conducive to the canal's safe operation, impacting global trade and the environment.

To conclude, waiting for the ship to be cleared by conventional means is the most responsible and effective approach. Attempting a nuclear solution would be an extremely foolish and damaging decision that prioritizes short-term gains over long-term stability and environmental health.