Palestin Was Never a Country, You Dumb Pos!
Some have questioned the legitimacy of Zionism and the ownership of land by Jewish settlers in Palestine. The assertion that Palestine has never been a country and that indigenous Palestinians are not the rightful owners of the land is a common trope used by those who deny historical facts and scientific evidence. This article aims to provide a thorough analysis of the land purchases by Zionist settlers, the role of indigenous Palestinians, and the legal and ethical implications of these actions.
The Zionist Narrative and Its Critics
The argument that 'Palestine' does not exist is a baseless claim often made by those who seek to downplay or outright deny the historical and cultural presence of Palestinians in the region. This narrative is supported by various Zionist propagandists who use twisted and misleading information to advance their agenda. Similarly, the idea that Palestinians are not indigenous to the area is also a fallacy, as the majority of the population in the region have deep historical roots dating back centuries.
It is crucial to acknowledge the facts based on scientific evidence, such as DNA studies, which confirm the genetic and cultural ties of the Palestinian population to the region. According to British records from 1945, Jews owned only 6% of Palestine, a majority of which was owned by foreign corporations. Arabs owned about 50%, and the rest was held as community property under Arab sovereignty. These records, collected by the British before the establishment of the State of Israel, provide a clear picture of the land ownership before the conflict.
Legal and Ethical Considerations
The United Nations has recognized that transactions for the acquisition of land between the State of Israel and its nationals on one hand, and the inhabitants of the occupied territories, on the other, have no validity in law and cannot be recognized as legal changes in ownership. The reason for this is that the inhabitants of the occupied territories are not acting as free agents due to the lack of protection and guidance from the previous regime.
Furthermore, the Special Committee has emphasized that these transactions would create significant obstacles to restoring the pre-1967 status quo. The United Nations has a responsibility to ensure that the territories under occupation are not subject to acquisition by Israel or its nationals. It is essential for the international community to not allow conditions that would leave large areas and settlements claimed to have been acquired by Israel or its nationals in the heart of the territories after the cessation of the military occupation.
Refusal to Repatriate and New Settlements
Another issue of concern is the continued refusal of the Israeli government to repatriate Palestinians who were displaced during and after the 1967 hostilities. In many cases, Israeli settlements have been established on land belonging to these displaced Palestinians. For example, in the village of Fik in the Golan Heights, Israeli settlements have been established on the former lands of the same name.
The utilization of new Jewish immigrants to populate these settlements is a serious misuse of the right to leave one's own country. This undermines the right to return to one's own country and the right to self-determination. It is a form of displacement and colonization that has severe ethical and humanitarian implications.
Conclusion
The historical and current narrative surrounding Zionism and the ownership of land in Palestine is complex. While it is important to acknowledge the historical roots of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, it is equally important to base these discussions on accurate and verifiable information. The land purchases by Zionist settlers and the subsequent establishment of settlements have significant legal and ethical implications. The international community must carefully consider these factors and work towards a solution that respects the rights of all parties involved.